THE NOOMA WAITLIST IS NOW OPEN. Founding Members lock in 25% off. Permanently.
Your HRIS is doing its job
Storing records, processing payroll, managing leave, meeting Single Touch Payroll requirements. That foundation isn't optional.
But the HRIS was never designed to support the work that sits above it. When enterprise software companies began moving into HR in the 1970s and 1980s, they applied the same logic they had built for supply chains and warehousing. A new employee inducted the way a unit of stock is receipted. Headcount turnover calculated the same way as inventory turnover.
The entire architecture of HR technology was built on the premise that people are units to be processed. Across roughly twenty major platforms spanning seventy-five years of global and Australian development, not one was founded by someone who has actually done the job.
Our workforce data repositories were never the problem. But they are no longer enough.
What sits above traditional HR technology
Largely unsupported by anything built for it. Employee surveys, applicant tracking, learning platforms: a handful of specialist tools solve specific pieces of the work well. But the majority of what defines modern HR sits in a wide open space, held together by nothing more than Microsoft.
An ER case register in Excel. Succession planning rebuilt from scratch every time. Policy reviews that don't happen because there's no capacity when the review date arrives. Digging through SharePoint for the exit interview template five minutes before a coffee with a senior leader who's leaving.Searching personnel files for old letters and contracts to repurpose. After-dinner hours spent tweaking board papers. Reconciling notebooks and sent emails to pull together a WIP update. Merging disparate data to build a picture of what the metrics are doing, without any of it really telling you much. Relying on complaints to reveal that things are taking too long or people aren't getting support, because there's no structured way to see service satisfaction.
All of it takes time, energy, organisation, repurposing, recreation. Before we even get to do the job.
The conversations behind closed doors. The guidance that stops a risk from being realised. The quiet intervention before it becomes a problem. All of it invisible to the systems we use.
This is why measuring HR's impact has been limited to the workforce data we already have. We've never had the infrastructure to see the work itself.
What HR practitioners need is enablement. A single place to see every piece of work in motion. Live metrics that mean something, without spending hours crunching numbers to get them. Technology that cuts through the busy work: building templates, retrieving research, drafting the first version, tracking priorities. A practice companion for all the impact created above the HRIS.
When we explain HR to business owners, most are surprised to learn how much of it there is. HR's role in readying the capabilities of an organisation to deliver tens, sometimes hundreds of millions in revenue is rarely obvious from the outside. For most business owners, HR looks like hiring, firing, and the paperwork in between.
Here is the critical gap. Large businesses have always had access to HR capabilities that sit well beyond the consistent needs, or resources, of most privately held businesses. You don't need that capability all the time. But when you do, you want it. And just for as long as you need it.Most businesses grow into HR. Beneath the confidence of having payroll sorted sits a quieter worry. You know there's probably more you should be doing. Policies that haven't been touched since the business was half its size. Contracts that were fine three years ago. Performance conversations that get delayed because there isn't a structured way to have them. Managers making people decisions without a framework, hoping they're getting it right.The person doing HR in most small-to-medium businesses is rarely a dedicated HR professional. That's not a criticism. It's a reality. And they need support to do everything they can well, and to know when to call in specialist help.
Larger Australian businesses invest around three times more per employee in workforce development than SMEs. The Productivity Commission has confirmed the gap is structural. Issues get left alone until they escalate. By then, the conversation is usually a legal one, and it costs more than it ever needed to.
How Nooma came to be
We built Nooma because we believe HR can be done better. The infrastructure just hasn't existed until now.
We believe measuring HR with workforce data alone sells the profession short. The value HR creates is mostly invisible in the metrics we've been handed.
We believe capability shouldn't depend on the size of the budget. HR infrastructure should be accessible to any practitioner, any business, regardless of scale. We believe tools should be designed around the human doing the work. Not a multi-year commitment that lands in the enterprise tech stack after a subpar implementation.
We built Nooma inside the community we serve. The Industry Council of senior HR professionals reviewing how AI is deployed, and pushing back on it where it shouldn't be used at all. The advisors guiding governance and risk. The practitioners stress-testing workflows against real HR work. The University of Sydney and University of Melbourne students, plus our inhouse Responsible AI analyst conducting independent bias testing. Our partners kept onshore.
This is ours.
Built by the people who do HR, for the people who do HR.
Our success will be measured by the people using Nooma. Whether they report more confidence in the decisions they make. Whether their stakeholders report better service. Whether compliance maturity improves over time. Whether the activity mix shifts from administrative to advisory. Whether the profession can finally point to structured evidence of the value it creates.
Those are the measures that will tell us Nooma has done its job.
Why we built this
Governance as a design choice
The decisions behind how this platform is designed, what data is collected, how AI is used, and where the boundaries sit, are informed by real governance experience. By someone who has held ultimate accountability for the personal data of tens of thousands of employees across nearly twenty years of leading HR functions in complex organisations. Someone who knows what it means when that data is handled badly, and has built this platform so that it cannot be.
Built by HR people, for HR people
Follow our progress as we build, or read the research shaping how we're building it
At O-HR, we take pride in our commitment to excellence in human resources. As proud members of the Australian Human Resources Institute (AHRI), we stay at the forefront of industry standards and best practices.
South Melbourne (03) 8374 7693 hello@o-hr.com.au
Acknowledgment of country
